Dear Tita Marge,
This is in light of what has turned out to be bigger than the kind reprimand that you gave me re the Rhian and Mo piece. I apologize that my response was such, but I had taken my cue from you as you kept saying it was a minor thing, both in the private message you sent me and the one on your Facebook wall.
This edit was sent to my editor right after I read your reprimand.
As it is a weekend, I’m sure the edit will happen tomorrow.
I believe there has been a misinterpretation of that section of the piece.
Dr. Margie Holmes asks on Facebook: why weren’t they careful? We are after all living in a time when there seems to be no excuse for accidental pregnancies, a time when information might easily be had about birth control. But that is not tru
All I had wrongly attributed to you, as I say “asks” is that question. The statement after it, as this was not a question, I did not mean to attribute to you in any way. If this was not clear, then I apologize for that as well.
Certainly there was no malice in any of this as I was writing this piece, nor was there intent to “sully your reputation” or put your credibility into question.
This formal apology would have been written earlier were I not put under the impression that you were scolding me about a “slight tampo” and that I could respond with the same kind of familiarity that I reserve for very few people who go way back with Angela. If that was my own fault at interpreting the situation, then I apologize for that as well.
Katrina.
[…] to dish it out and so i know to take it, too. and i will apologize, i will admit to my own faults, as i already have in this case. i misattributed this question to Dr. Margarita Holmes in the 13th paragraph from the Rhian and Mo […]